Tag 2A

“The Confusion Over Signs of Destiny”

The Confusion Over “Signs of Destiny”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

This essay was written in May 2018 at the Hanover Inn while I was at an Alumni Council weekend at Dartmouth College.

Have you ever experienced yourself, or maybe heard stories from friends, where something unusual  happened that may have been more than just the usual “coincidence”?

For example, this just happened to me. I seemingly randomly walked into the new student center at my college alma mater. When I was there in the 1970s, there was no such place for students to hang out. We either had our dorm rooms, or…outside (in the freezing cold, -30°F was common in the winter in Hanover, New Hampshire, so outdoor parties...not so much til Spring!!). I went right to the information desk and had a nice far-ranging conversation with the student working there. He of course told me the history of the student center, but we quickly got into personal stuff — my being on campus for the Alumni Council meetings, that I had just come from the building next-door where I had discovered to my pleasant surprise that the meditation center I founded in 1971 was still up on the third floor — although now decorated with fancy furniture, carpeting, dividing walls — a far cry from the Dean’s secretary Mrs. Johnson’s “sure, you can use the third floor but you’ll need to clear out the desks, chairs and other stuff that are stacked up and stored there.” We talked about his film production career after graduation, his playing offensive tackle for the football team, and my nonprofit work. He even suggested an on-campus organization that I should contact to help student-athletes with my meditation work.

An hour later I asked him his name. 

His name has significant meaning for me. I thought, “wow, that’s interesting.” Not a usual name, and one that has a lot of meaning for me personally.

“Marcus.”

Many of us have had similar experiences. That very strange, highly unusual, seemingly random event or chance meeting that otherwise seems inexplicable.

So, we often hear people say, “It was meant to be. It was destiny that it happened. It had to happen.”

Was that a “sign” or evidence that there is something called Destiny?

No, I don’t think so.

And yet I actually think there is a good explanation for why these things happen. As well as a good explanation for why many people think these are signs of some sort of predestination.

Essentially you could distill it down to these two points: 1) yes, there may be communications coming to us from the Other Side, but 2) that does not mean that replaces or usurps Free Will.

Let’s try to unbundle that common conflation in the world — that these sort of “unexplained coincidences” are evidence of destiny or determinism.

First, let’s agree on one thing. That we are all minds or consciousnesses — some people like to use the word souls. I tend to use the word “minds” because it is not religiously or culturally charged. It’s more neutral. Feel free to use a synonym if you like. 

And my experience is that our minds are eternal, or at least they last for a very, very long time based on memories that I have had. I’ve written about this idea of eternity in other blogs and essays.

So that means that our minds can and do exist after the physical death of the body.

My experience also supports the notion that personal choice exists. That Free Will is always operating. Each of us can always choose to make different choices in life, that no one has absolute control over us with “puppet strings,” or maybe even a better image — no one has us chained and enslaved.

Yet, the fact that minds “on the other side of the veil” may sometimes communicate with us on this side can often muddy the waters causing some people to use it as evidence of destiny. The idea that “whisperings from the other side” to minds on this side may create appearances of predestination. 

Instead, I think they are just more examples of things happening caused by the desires and intentions of various minds. 

For example, maybe one of my friends on the Other Side whispers to me as I’m walking across the campus to go explore the old meditation room on the third floor of Robinson Hall, which may also happen to coincide with a desire that I had already had myself. But the whispering simply prods me, pushes me in that direction that I was already leaning in this case. 

Think of it this way. It’s no different from a friend who is in physical form walking alongside of you who says, “let’s go check that old room out.” To me, it’s the same thing. Whether you can see the person or not. Doesn’t matter.

But then it’s still up to me to choose to go or not go. Which is why it does not happen every time, because our Free Will is operating all the time

But, when the mind is more aware, the various desires and intentions are more likely to manifest. It’s all probabilities. Nothing is guaranteed. (Guarantee is implied in the concept of “Destiny.”) But the level of self-awareness of the minds involved definitely comes into play.

So, maybe somebody did whisper to that student working at the information desk, or whispered to a number of people to increase the likelihood that he would be working at the desk on the day I walked in. Who knows?

But, while the confluence of situations and events that led up to my meeting him may seem unusual from a certain perspective, it does not mean that there was a guaranteed meeting — a Destiny.

Why is this important?

Because I think a belief in Destiny is a source of suffering for many people — whether they realize it or not. It can cause people to “hold back,” to be passive in life. Hesitant. Always waiting for some “sign.” And when it doesn’t come, or if it seems to come, and doesn’t work out as expected — despair.

“Why have I been forsaken?”
“What did I do wrong?”
“What did I do to deserve this?”

Instead of taking action and assertively making choices based on the data at hand. And in the long-run, they tend to not learn from their lives on Earth — repeating the same old patterns often based on ancient cognitively inconsistent beliefs — and continue for lifetimes suffering in ways that might be overcome by continued conscious explorations and knowingly making a wider variety of more effective choices over those lifetimes. Without fear of experimenting in those many previous lives through those choices.

That is my reason for sharing these thoughts.

To perhaps, if they resonate, help us see life from different perspectives, different seats in the theater of life, so that we might perceive our long-held ideas and beliefs in a different light. Maybe a light that may bring more clarity to our life’s choices. And thus, less suffering and more happiness.

More contentment as we each travel in our respective journeys through the universe.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Guilty Pleasures”

“Guilty Pleasures”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Where does this idea come from? Is it good for us to have?

See my essay on “Sex & Spirituality” in my 2021 book Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life. I won’t repeat that essay here, except to say that the origin I think of this notion of “guilty pleasures” came from a bunch of celibate monks 8-10,000 years ago who honestly thought it was good advice.

Food for thought. 

But OK, let’s back up a bit and let’s focus on the “guilty” part. And expand the discussion here beyond just sex.

What is a “guilty pleasure” in our modern day society?

The dictionary definition is “something, such as a movie, TV program, or piece of music, that one enjoys despite feeling that it is not generally held in high regard.”

So, it is something embarrassing to admit to enjoying — like watching reality TV shows, preferring comic books over reading “The Economist” magazine, or eating potato chips as your “vegetable” for your evening meal.

But I want to expand our thinking about “guilty pleasures” from merely the 21st century slang that we may be familiar with. Because I think in that slang phrase lies a deeper, more troubling seed that has grown over the millennia without our knowing or paying attention to.

I think this idea of “guilty pleasures” arises from a “should” place. A “Thou shalt” — or an equally commanding “Thou shalt not” — place. 

“You shouldn’t eat that piece of dark chocolate cake…”

And why “should we not”? Why should we not experience the pleasures of life? Whether they be from chocolate cake, comic books or sex.

I think it may actually originate from the idea that this earthly life is not the important one — we are only here temporarily to get to the Afterlife where we will live for eternity. That will be the place of “pleasure.” So, we should forsake all pleasures while we are living on Earth. We really should not be having fun while here on Earth. Thus, the term “guilty pleasures.”

Also, there is this other element built into the idea of “guilty pleasures.”
The thrill. 

Hold back, hold back, hold back….OK, now let go!

The thrill of the taste of dark chocolate in one’s mouth, the thrill of touching the smoothness of skin in a religiously forbidden area of the body, the thrill of Mardi Gras before Lent starts.

We have a fundamental problem as humans. We are generally fairly numb to experience. Our mental, emotional and physical sensory antennas are dull and poorly calibrated — lacking sharpness and alertness. So we need the roller coaster ride. The fireworks. The thrill to “wake us up” out of our slumber. Our dull state of zombie sleepwalking.

But why is this so? What has caused us to be a population of so many sleepwalkers?

A combination. 

Partially belief based as we have pointed out. But also partially experienced based. We have so little familiarity with the vastness and creativity, and inner power of our mind — our individual consciousness — that we feel very insecure. And are generally inept at accessing the incredible capabilities of our own minds. But since I’ve written elsewhere extensively about how we can expand our capacity (see my book referenced above), I want to stay focused here on this different “approach” to thinking about pleasure. 

Instead…

How about this?

Lean into the pleasure. 

Don’t hold back. Instead, move in the direction of the pleasure. That’s what I mean by “lean into it.” Don’t pull away from it — move towards it.

Savor the dark chocolate cake. Let each morsel be caressed by your tongue and appreciated by your taste buds. Don’t eat it looking over your shoulder to see who is watching you. Judging you. 

Lean into the pleasure.

OK, sure — teasing a little is fine. Playful. But stay clear of the guilt-ridden act of holding back.

And note: Those of you who have read my essays on “selfishness” know that I am not suggesting a culture of hedonism at any cost. An irresponsible pursuit of all pleasures. No. 

But withholding ourselves from enjoying the pleasures of life has created a world 🌎 of suffering. 

I have spoken with many people who have felt guilty about taking care of themselves, of enjoying anything for themselves personally in their lives. Some have said all they find pleasure in is “helping others” at the temple, the food bank, etc. But they then feel guilty whenever they take a moment for themselves so they keep busy all the time to distract themselves from thinking about their needs and desires. 

What a waste of human lifeforce. How sad.

I think far too many well-meaning people live like that. Essentially unhappy their entire lives. But appearing to the outside world as “a Good Samaritan who sacrificed all for the good of others.” A “Mother Theresa.” How many times have you heard that? How many times have you praised someone for that extreme degree of selflessness?

Are you helping or hurting them?

Let’s think about this further.

Why are people cruel in our world 🌎? As I’ve written about, I think because at their core they’re unhappy, insecure people. And to make themselves happier they then need to make others around them unhappy. So the cruel person then feels better! Happier. Accomplished through their cruel behavior. Sometimes consciously. But usually this is unconscious. 

So could we actually be contributing to the cruelty in the world by our not exploring what would give us each personal pleasure? Not that we are acting cruelly towards others intentionally. But are we adding to the unhappiness in the world nevertheless by tacitly demonstrating our belief that “personal pleasure is bad”? 

And by this, are we perhaps creating a greater likelihood of falling prey to the occasional outlet of very unhappy people — treating others badly, cruelly? All subconsciously of course.

Food for thought.

Don’t make “guilt” an integral part of your “seeking of pleasure” in life. 

Why are we here?
Why did we choose to be here in physical biological bodies on Earth?

To enjoy life. All of it. All the parts of it. That’s my opinion. Hopefully without hurting others in the process.

So let’s live it fully — and that means without guilt. Without holding back from the pleasures of life. 

No more “guilty pleasures.” 

Lean into the pleasure.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“A Huge Source of Suffering”

“A Huge Source of Suffering”

Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert & Meditation Teacher


Being an “over-helper”!

Usurps the other person’s sense of control and Free Will.
Trains the person to be enslaved. 

That “unasked for help” immediately feels like a violation to those who are more self-confident. And to those who are less confident about their ability to manage life it feels good — temporarily. Then it eventually feels patronizing and the person develops resentment towards the unasked for help. 

We can see that with raising our children, in our friendships, in our marriages, in our attempts at social welfare, and in our foreign affairs globally. 

And furthermore, for those who have taken my Afterlife series classes…

That’s why the “30th November” message was shared in 2014. 

It was a marker in the spiritual history of humankind to make clear that key spiritual leaders involved in the world 🌎 for the past 10,000 years had decided that they too recognized that “over helping” causes suffering. 

That by demanding obedience from their followers, they inadvertently caused those devout followers to be more susceptible to being bullied by others — others who didn’t have the kind motives that these spiritual leaders had. 

In effect, by demanding spiritual obedience, these leaders had unwittingly trained their followers to become more compliant, more passive. And — unfortunately — more vulnerable to being taken advantage of by selfish and narcissistic people in the world. 

Ironically, the more devout the follower, the more obedient they were — yet the more vulnerable they became to mistreatment by others. 

In addition, this approach squelched the followers’ ability to exercise their Free Will. And the long-term impact of that — becoming increasingly less effective at making good life choices — has caused tremendous conflict and suffering in billions of people worldwide over the millennia. 

So, for all those reasons, as was stated in the 30th November messages, it was decided that no longer would any of them continue to demand unwavering obedience or subservience for any reason, spiritual or otherwise. And instead, they’re encouraging us to see them all as our friends. Not our gurus, divine masters or gods. 

More parity. Less hierarchy. 

An encouragement to begin to view life more as an eternal democracy. 

And I would add that since they have laid down the marker about this in 2014 to all of us here on Earth, these spiritual leaders have turned much of their attention towards educating and spreading these messages among all those on the Other Side. And we’ve been told that it’s an even more challenging task there, given the engrained beliefs in the value of hierarchies. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The Power of Love”

“The Power of Love”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

I teach people how to overcome their fears. About death. And about uncertainty. 

Along with overcoming those fears comes greater self-acceptance. More love. Love for oneself. 

Jesus taught that “love” means “accepting the other person for who they are, not who you wish they were, or think they should be.” But can we apply that same principle to ourselves? I think so. 

Accepting ourselves for who we each are — including all our quirks and imperfections. Not who we wish we were. I think we each can apply that individually. Each in our own unique personal ways. 

That is actual self-acceptance. True self-love. 

As you may also know, I work in the field of Afterlife education as well. I often hear stories of people who have had NDEs, “near-death experiences.” And a common theme in their recounting of their experiences is that they feel “more love than they’ve ever felt before.”

I have sometimes wondered how much that intense perceived degree of love, i.e., acceptance, is directly related to the lack of love they have felt from others — their parents, spouses, friends — before their NDE. Or even lack of self-acceptance within themselves. 

So I thought about the “power of love” in the context of NDEs. 

What if one was so loved and accepted — most importantly by one’s own self — before one had the NDE? Could we imagine what that experience of the Afterlife might be like then?

Perhaps it would be less shocking. Due to less contrast.

Coming already from a “place” or a state of being of profound self-acceptance perhaps the transition would simply be a smooth and easy one. Without the gasps and the wows that often accompany such typically high contrast experiences. 

And what would that have meant if that were to hypothetically take place?

It would have meant that that person had “turned within” consistently and over a long enough period to become so comfortable with herself that she was pretty much in a state of self-acceptances, or love, most of the time. 

And what would that give rise to?

A very happy life. A fulfilled life. Now. Here on Earth 🌎. Long before transitioning to the Other Side. 

So why wait? Why not start now?


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Non-Duality Theory Creates Suffering”

“Non-Duality Theory Creates Suffering”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Some notes…

Oneness and Non-Duality = in conflict with Importance of Boundaries 

Besides the emotional attraction to the experience of unity, the non-duality theory attracts minds (on Earth 🌎 and on the Other Side) who have often experienced trauma or loneliness in life. 

But really it’s a combination of being disconnected within themselves and of misunderstanding the genuine experience of connection. 

Disconnected with their own minds — with both their conscious mind as well as the need for making their subconscious more conscious — i.e., disconnected from the actuality of the vastness of their individual mind. The misperceived belief that their individual mind is very limited. 

Misunderstanding of the experience of connection with oneself and with our external reality. 

Bottom line:

Connection is not “oneness.”
Duality exists. 
Duality is not bad. 

Experiencer and experience = duality

Experiencer does not in reality ever merge with the experience.
“Feeling connected” is not “losing one’s identity.”
One still retains one’s ability to experience. 

“Blanking out” or “unawareness” during meditation is a sign of being overwhelmed. A sign that fear (or physical exhaustion) has overtaken one’s sense of self. 
It is the mind passing out. It’s not connection. It’s “disconnection.”

Importance of Boundaries:

Belief in the misunderstanding of non-duality can lead to suffering. 
Not establishing and seeing boundaries as a good and appropriate thing in daily life is critical. 
Otherwise can lead to getting hurt emotionally, physically or psychically. 

Can lead to “letting in” others into one’s life who are not healthy and not supportive of our well being. 

More and “all” connection with everyone and everything in the universe is not a sign of increased self-awareness. On the contrary, it’s a sign of naïveté. Of a mind who has not learned the necessity of drawing lines, establishing boundaries. This is one of the key skills of intellectual discrimination. And that starts from within by understanding our own uniqueness in the universe. Rejoicing and embracing that uniqueness. And exercising it when appropriate in our daily lives. 

Not confusing that need to establish boundaries with disconnecting from others. Or from “not loving others”!

Love ❤️ is “accepting the other person for who they are — not who we wish they would be.” It is not “losing oneself in the other” — that is actually impossible. And should not be confused with the “feeling” of connection with another person, which is real and genuine. 

Understanding those key differences and distinctions is critical for increasing the likelihood that we may live life freer from self-imposed suffering. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“For Guys Only”

“For Guys Only”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert


I’m a guy.

I’ve played organized competitive sports, led large business organizations, and scuba dived at 115 feet deep in the ocean.

But those of you who measure “being a guy” only in those terms are missing out. Not only that, but you could be setting a bad example for your young sons, the men of the future.

Too many guys measure their “maleness” by how macho they are. By how much testosterone they can exude to the world — typically to the world of women. How much of that male hormone they can spill onto the widest variety of playing fields — in business, sports, and yes at home — any number of what they view as the “battlefields” of life.

Ok, I don’t want to leave out my LBGTQ friends from this discussion because yes, those guys are guilty of limiting themselves in this way too. They can be equally guilty of excessive “peacock feather rattling.” And yes, they too can be fathers to straight or gay sons. So, being as inclusive as possible....

We guys — all of us — need to grow up. 
We need to emotionally mature beyond puberty. 

Because not only are we potentially missing out, but we’re also creating a higher likelihood of bad hurtful behavior towards others. And that includes others whom we may care about. 

What are we “missing out” on? 

How about having a mutually loving, emotionally rich relationship with our spouse or girlfriend? Or with our children? Or our grandchildren? (Yes, grandpa, it’s never too late to start moving beyond your puberty-based fears and limitations...)

By continuing to act in that emotionally “me-oriented” state we embraced as 16 year olds, we limit ourselves to women (or men) who will “put up with us.” As opposed to partners who actually want to be with us, and feel like they can thrive with us. Not in spite of us. 

And worse. That juvenile narcissistic behavior, when played out by a 40, 50, or 60 year old man — or god forbid, if he is a father — risks hurting others through his bullying, of his spouse or children. 

And then, what a tragic example of how to “be a man” such a dad demonstrates to his sons. 

Yet, even so, the “I am who I am because of my father” is a poor excuse in my book. We each can change. If we want to. If we are strong enough. 

That’s strength. True strength. 

When you are met with adversity — in this case maybe a lousy role model — and you nevertheless overcome the bullying behavior of your father and become a truly strong, emotionally caring human being. A better father than what you had. 

That is a demonstration of true strength.

So guys, no matter how young or old you are, or where you live in the world 🌎, think about this. 

Honestly ask yourself if this describes you. And know that you can do something about it, if you want. You can change. You can grow. You can be a better person — you can let your testosterone flow and be a caring guy too. You can be “stronger” in a real way — not just a showy peacock way.

And you might find that your girlfriend, spouse, or kids may love you more for it. 

That’s the benefit of being a real man. Not just a man respected by men.
But a man respected by women.
And children. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.


“The Plague of the Importance of Being Important”

“The Plague of the Importance of Being Important”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert


We often hear in these times of the COVID-19 pandemic the use of the word “plague.”

What does the word “plague” mean?

Webster’s Dictionary says: “a disastrous affliction, an epidemic disease causing a high rate of mortality.”

I want to take this idea a bit further, outside of the COVID-19 context. Perhaps shine a light on a bigger problem, an underlying problem, maybe even a cause of the “psychological plague” that has infected the human race for millennia and continues to wreak havoc among us today. 

The “Importance of Being Important”

First let’s start by briefly addressing some commonly discussed psycho-social ills that we all have seen that afflict our species. 

I think most of us would agree that bias exists in our world 🌎. “Bias” means preference. Plain and simple. It comes in many forms. 

Height. Weight. Economic. Health. Race. Ethnicity. Age. Gender. Sexual preference. Nationality. City. Sports team. University. Company. Diet. Eye color. Hair color. Baldness. Vocal. Quiet. The list could go on. 

You get the idea. We are all biased about something. 

And it is not inherently a bad thing. I would argue it is necessary to make assessments. To discriminate in life. That’s what “discrimination” used to mean before the U.S. culture labeled that word negatively in the 1960’s when it became almost exclusively associated with racial prejudice. 

So bias is real. Necessary. And not bad by itself. 

What is bad is when we ignore our biases. When we become unconscious to them. And we act indiscriminately without forethought. And when those biases become hurtful to others. 

When I was in elementary school, the “mentally challenged” kids were intermingled with all of us in gym class and during recess, i.e., play time before school and after lunch. Some kids would tease them and make fun of them. I would intervene. Tell those kids to stop ✋ 🛑 To leave them alone. And I would talk with the challenged kids sometimes — publicly and privately — so they knew they were also “like us” and not just different due to their mental abilities. 

It is not that I didn’t see those kids as different mentally. Of course I did. And it’s not that I didn’t prefer to play with my other friends. Of course I did. But I drew the line when I saw hurtful behavior directed at them. I did not allow that in my presence. 

We cannot control the thinking and actions of others. But when in the presence of bad behavior, we can act. Or not. That is a choice we each have. 

So bias is real. But how we handle our biases is up to each of us. 

Another example from my youth… When I lived and worked teaching meditation in Asia in my 20’s, I many times observed racial bias. I had previously personally experienced it growing up in a Caucasian dominated Boston suburb. But in Asia it was different. 

I observed Caucasians being treated negatively by the dominant Asian culture. This was a brand new experience for me. And it was very apparent — not hidden at all — that it was because the Caucasians were racially not Asian. 

It was apparent both in the disdain, the sometimes outright visible look of contempt on the face of the Chinese or Koreans I lived among when they interacted with some American, British or Australian Caucasians. And it was verbally apparent in what they called them — translation from Chinese — “white foreign devils.”

Now, please understand I’m not here to get into a political colonialism discussion. That’s not my point. Because I have also witnessed many instances of justified anger by the colonized cultures. 

So what’s my point?

The tribalism that exists worldwide.
The separation that humans do when they are in groups. 

And why do we do it in a way that is sometimes hurtful to others?

I think we are all — yes ALL of us — without exception — sometimes afflicted with the “Importance of Being Important.”

And we use it — usually unconsciously — when we feel tired, disempowered or insecure. 

Why? 

Because it makes us feel good. 

Why did some kids bully the mentally challenged kids at the Cleveland Elementary School in Norwood, Massachusetts in 1960? Because it made them feel powerful, “better than someone else.” 

Why did the Chinese shop owners snicker behind the backs of the much wealthier (arguably more powerful) Caucasian women and men, and talk about them negatively in Cantonese so they wouldn’t understand? Because it made them feel more powerful, “better than someone else.”

At least temporarily. 

And so we go on. And on. And on. We repeat that behavior for generations and generations. We teach our children by our behavior and they in turn teach theirs. 

And these scenarios are repeated worldwide hundreds of millions of times a day.
Every day. Every year. 

In every culture. 

We as a human race need to stop 🛑 and think about this tribal mentality — the “group think” of manipulating various biases towards others to make us feel good. Think and reflect on this behavioral pattern we have created for ourselves worldwide 🌎 for the past 400,000 years. 

And especially when that tribalism leads to cruelty. 

“Cruelty” is when someone gets pleasure out of hurting another person. 

And why do they act cruelly? For the same reason we discussed above. Because they feel weaker, more insecure, less powerful at that moment. And by demeaning someone else, we make them feel worse so we feel better. 

It could be caused simply by fatigue or low blood sugar — I have had moments like that when I snapped at my kids unnecessarily when I was exhausted or too hungry from driving too long without a break. We have all had moments like that. 

Or in a more complicated psychological profile, the insecurity could be deeper and less transient, perhaps caused by the powerlessness and lack of love ❤️ shown a child by a father especially in the child’s formative years. Even maybe resulting in such a lack of sensibility for the needs of others that the “Importance of Being Important” and its cruelty component causes sociopathic behavior in the  child later as an adult. 

These general principles of the “Importance of Being Important” and “Transcending Cruelty” were introduced in the 30thNovember talk I organized in 2014. And they are topics that the spiritual group, the Movement, that some of you may have heard me discuss in my classes, has encouraged us to discuss further. 

In conclusion — and to be continued — because this is a long term discussion that I hope will continue among us for millennia 🌎 worldwide — bias or preference is real. I would argue it is neutral, neither positive nor negative. But when our biases become exercised in a hurtful way — perhaps instigated by our need for the “Importance of Being Important” to satiate our insecurities — then that cruel behavior needs to be curbed by providing the means to develop more inner security.

While the list of experts to provide more security in the economic, political, educational, gender equality, and other arenas is long, I am not one of them. So instead, I focus on my work helping people in my areas of expertise — how to “turn within” and strengthen ourselves from the inside out, and Overcoming the Fear of Death. 

I ask you to look at your areas of expertise — whether professionally or avocationally — and apply your energies as you see fit to helping others develop greater inner security. In that way, you will be a contributor and solution provider to what I would argue is the most debilitating plague of the human race — the Importance of Being Important.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Earth — a Planet of False Hopes, Dreams & Expectations”

Earth — a Planet of False Hopes, Dreams & Expectations 

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

We live on a planet 🌏 inhabited by humans who are addicted to being inspired. But who have little interest in taking the actions required to fulfill those hopes, dreams and expectations that inspire them. 

Why is that?

I wonder if it’s because we are so enamored by those who are enthusiastic about (whatever)(fill in the blank...religion, politics, education, finance, family, whatever) that we stop 🛑 there at the sight of enthusiasm. And promptly follow whatever has initiated that enthusiasm.

Why? Because it feels good! 

Right? It “feels good” to be enthusiastic. To be inspired. 

But is it wise to stop 🛑 there and just follow the enthusiastic throng?

I think not. 

There are many examples throughout history where the enthusiastic throng was proven to be on the “wrong side of history” — the 1919 Treaty of Versailles that arguably led to the creation of Nazi Germany, 1930’s Germany and its nationalist fervor, religious oppression of the Holy Inquisition in the 1200’s, Mao and his Cultural Revolution that killed 3 million and persecuted 100 million, and slavery for millennia as a means of maximizing business profit. 

What they all have in common was that the masses — or enough of the masses in those regions — were enthusiastic in their support of whatever. 

What was lacking was any forethought about what seen and unintended consequences would likely result from those actions. 

What was missing?

Rational thought. 

The problem with rational thinking is that it’s not “sexy.” It doesn’t give you an immediate thrill. It doesn’t make you tingle like “enthusiasm” does — even if the enthusiasm is misplaced. 

But I have found that thinking rationally — asking “does it make sense?” — has brought about more long lasting happiness for me than merely following the latest hope, dream or expectation driving the most recent enthusiastic reaction from the pedestrian on the street. 

Sure, it’s not as flashy and tingly. But my happiness — my long term happiness and inner contentment — is worth more to me than some fleeting “feel-good” experience based on some unfounded hope, dream or expectation created by someone or some group I don’t know. 

And while we’re on the subject of rationally assessing our decision making and sources of enthusiasm and inspiration, let’s address some of our friends on the Other Side. 

Angels — especially the ones who have charged themselves with looking after 🌍 Earth’s inhabitants —  are doing no one but themselves a favor by promoting enthusiastic thinking about the false belief that the world 🌎 will be enlightened overnight, that some “Renaissance” is coming to Earth “soon....”

First, this popular spiritual myth violates the principle of Free Will.
No angel or “god” can force someone to be loving if they don’t want to be. 

And second, do the psychics, mediums and spiritual teachers channeling this message from their sources on the Other Side not read history? Do they not know that angels and others over “there” have been saying this for millennia?

And...uh-hem. Has the world 🌎 in 2020 become that “enlightened” planet after all those thousands of years of similar “predictions”?

Do those claims even pass the “common sense” test?

I am here to inspire. But I choose to inspire through realism and idealism. Not merely through the latter alone. 

Because my experience over the past several thousand years watching so many — who have been enthusiastic and inspired, only to later become dejected and depressed when they don’t see the turnaround as quickly as their hopes, dreams and expectations had led them to believe — has taught me we need to take the “long view” on helping our fellowship of humankind to progress and develop. 

Let’s assume humans have been on Earth 🌍 for 400,000 years, give or take a few years. We have definitely progressed and become less cruel. But look how long it has taken for that limited but noticeable degree of progress to take hold in our cultures worldwide. And even then, there is still so much more to be done in reducing cruelty on our planet. 

So can we and should we continue to work as helpers of our planet — on cruelty, climate change, inequality — yes, absolutely. But we need to take the long view and not be discouraged if the successes we hope for do not materialize as fast or in the manner we expect. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Love Is Not A Feeling”

“Love Is Not A Feeling”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Most people think “love” is simply an emotion. A feeling. That’s what most people are taught. 

Most people teach that love ❤️ is “feeling good,” or “expressing good feelings” about others. A feeling that comes and goes.

I want to suggest a different perspective on this often referenced concept. 

I’m not suggesting that the above definition the way most people think of love is incorrect. But I am definitely stating that it is limited. 

Incomplete. 

And that incompleteness I think leads to disempowering the potential effects of this powerful idea. And worse, arguably sometimes creates suffering in our lives...in the name of “love.”

Love ❤️ 

I choose to define love in the way one of my early teachers taught us to love. Jesus said,

“Love is accepting the other person for who they are.
Not who you wish they were.”

That is not simply a feeling. Not a fleeting emotional response. It is definitely not merely a “feel good” feeling. And, it is not conditional. 

It is an act. An act that can become a state of being. 

What was he teaching us?

He was saying that, sure, we may all have expectations about what we desire in another person. How we hope they would interact and behave with us. How they might treat us. 

But that is not ultimately up to us. It is up to them. It is molded and shaped by who they are, what their personality is, combined with choices they make in how they interact with each of us. 

We do not control that. They do. 

And our acceptance of who they are frees them up to be themselves with us in a way that makes them feel welcomed by us. Not judged by us. 

And that increases the likelihood (nothing is ever guaranteed) that they may make choices in dealing with us that are in alignment with our needs at that moment. 

That is — provided their intentions are similar to ours. And if we each desire a mutually beneficial outcome. Where we both can be happy and fulfilled. 

But what if their expression — how they behave towards us —  is not in alignment with what we want or need? What if it is hurtful? This is where most people’s understanding of “love” falls apart. This is the crucial missing (or forgotten) component of that ancient teaching. 

We walk away.

That was and still is the advice. 

We see the other person “for who they are, not who we wish they were....” And if what we see is harmful to us mentally, emotionally, or physically, we need to separate from them. Walk away. 

And that is not only acknowledging who they are (in that 2,000-year-old definition of “love”), but it is also expressing our love for ourselves — “self love.”

That is love and the expression of love the way I was taught to frame it many years ago. 

I have sometimes been successful in the application of that approach to love. And other times not so much. 

None of us is perfect. So we need to be not so self critical, not so harsh in our self assessments. But we do need to aspire and attempt to move in the direction of this type of love: “as acceptance.”

That is: 
If we want to truly pursue a sustainable level of contentment and happiness in our lives. 

So today, as best I can, I continue to aspire to live that degree of love that I witnessed on a daily basis — for those three years 2,000 years ago.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

How The Belief “It Was Meant To Be” Causes Suffering

How The Belief “It Was Meant To Be” Causes Suffering

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert & Meditation Teacher

First, understand. It’s a belief.
Not a fact.
It’s a belief based on a desire, not based on factual reality. 

And if you want to believe it, it’s ok with me. I’m not here to change people’s religious beliefs. 

But if you want clarity in your understanding about reality and the universe, consider the following points. Then afterwards, perhaps reconsider whether your thinking that “everything happens for a reason” is a belief based on reality or wishful thinking. 

“Everything”

First, when someone says “everything happens for a reason,” the key word is “everything.” That means there are no exceptions. It is an absolute statement. 

“Everything” means every thing. Every occurrence. Every single thing that has happened, is happening, or will ever happen. 

They mean by saying that, that everything is predestined. Everything in the universe that has already happened was already known (by somebody) that it would happen, and that somebody knows what will happen before it happens. 

This concept or theory demands that Free Will, personal choice, does not and cannot exist in the universe. 

Free Will and Predestination cannot coexist. 

People who say they both exist are simply stating an illogical belief. It’s like saying, “I am sort of pregnant.” No. You either are. Or you are not. It is a binary fact. One or the other. You cannot be both pregnant. And not. 

So again. If someone wants to believe that is true, they can. But it’s not based in fact. 

The same thing applies to those who say Free Will and Predestination both exist.

The all-knowing somebody

What about this somebody who supposedly knows everything? And can predict everything?

Is that logical? Does that make sense?

This mind would have to be omniscient, all-knowing. And this has been the belief of many religions for millennia. 

First, is it logical? Second, why does this belief exist?

It is a logical impossibility. Because “knowing everything” means every thing. Without exception. And therefore, knowing everything means that this mind must also know what it is like to “know nothing.” Because “knowing nothing” is a subset of “knowing everything.”

That is impossible. No mind can — at the same moment — know everything and know nothing. 

certainty

But why do we create these illogical beliefs? Because we want certainty. And we would rather have the illusion of certainty than the reality of not having “an answer” — a catch-all answer. 

Sort of a “Get out of Jail” card in the board game Monopoly. A free “hall pass” in high school. 

But life isn’t a board game. 

It’s a journey where Free Will operates. And not just your Free Will. But also the Free Will of quadrillions of other minds on Earth 🌍. Which are all influencing each other in ways that we cannot predict or know absolutely. 

I get it. 

When something terrible happens to us, we want an explanation. We want a reason. We think that will make us feel better. And it may.

Temporarily. 

Until something happens that demonstrates that Free Will really does exist and that Predestination does not. (Remember they are each absolutes. No exceptions can apply.)

inconsistency & suffering

But what do most of us do? We cherry 🍒 pick. 

We say, “See, look at this wonderful thing that just happened! It was meant to be!”

And we ignore the examples that show us that not everything is predictable. Not everything is within our control. We selectively choose our evidence to support our belief.

But what happens when we take this inconsistent approach to our thinking?

We leave room for discord within ourselves. Logical and emotional discord. Suffering. 

Our mind wants to understand. And our emotions want to feel good. We want to be happy. 

The problem is the desire for immediacy. We are impatient. We want “drive-thru” spirituality. We want it quickly. We want it now. And we don’t want to do much — if anything — to get it. Just believe and move on.

happiness

There is nothing amiss with the desire to be happy. I think it’s why we are all here. Both on Earth 🌍 now and on the Other Side later. And wherever we choose to go afterwards. And so on. It is all about the pursuit of happiness to me. 

And I have found that — while it does take some additional work — logically thinking about life and the universe has brought me consistency in my thinking and thus emotional stability in my level of contentment. And thus my state of happiness.

Regardless of where the experience falls on the positive-neutral-negative spectrum. 

And yes. Even amidst times of extreme sadness.

Summary

So instead of trying to explain everything that happens in life by squeezing a square peg into a round hole, I suggest we accept life in the myriad of ways it presents to us. Enjoy those who are with us for as long as they are with us here. And know that nothing and no one can or is controlling everything. 

That we are each Free Will thinking minds who are influencing each other — and who are being influenced by quadrillions of other minds at any given moment. So, yes, while probabilities do exist — nothing can ever be predicted with absolute certainty. 

We each need to “turn within,” relax, and gain a sense of inner security and confidence that replaces our seeming need for certainty with a desire to explore and experience the innumerable ways to appreciate the infinite wonder of life’s eternal journey.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“We Are Not Disconnected From Each Other…”

“We Are Not Disconnected From Each Other…”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert & Meditation Teacher



We are not disconnected from each other. We are disconnected from ourselves. 

The most common misstatement in the spiritual world 🌎 — a world that has too often become an “echo chamber” of dissonant thinking — is that “We are all one.”

The problem with that “external” focus on connecting with others instead of “turning within” and connecting with ourselves is that it continues the illusion and misguided belief that if we only can find more ways to connect outside of ourselves, then we will have world 🌎 peace. 

Peace on Earth.

More rallies, more town halls, more sit-downs to discuss our differences.

Not true. 

We need to ask ourselves — what is our TRUE desire?

It is inner peace. Right? 

Yet, ironically, by continually seeking it outside of ourselves, we push ourselves FURTHER away from fulfilling our true desire.

This “seeking peace by connecting with others” is yet another example of — once again — being fooled by our near-constant overemphasis on the “XYZ” side of the “Conscious of XYZ” model. That’s the phrase I long ago borrowed from my good friend Charlie to illustrate our infatuation with the external over the internal. 

If we don’t each deal with our inner discord, then we will simply bring that discord to the rallies and town halls, and end up expressing that lack of inner peace in a myriad of externalized frustrations. We see it played out all the time.

And many spiritual seekers and their teachers are just as guilty of being seduced by the external. They may use less obvious terminology — not talking about “financial” materialism, for example, but materialism can be “spiritual” as well.

You might ask: “Who cares? Why does this matter?”

Because it causes people to stray further from that “peace” that they so desire in the first place.

Focusing on the XYZ’s lures us to be ever more distracted by trucks, flashy cars, big houses, clothes — and yes, even NDEs, STEs and other spiritual experiences that often elicit the “Wow, Gee whiz” reactions from those who have not had them. All of these are external in the way I’m defining it. They are all identifiable, concrete XYZ’s. 

External to what?

External to our essential individual selves our minds. Each of our minds which are unique from each other. (Note: I use “mind” since it is non-cultural and non-religious, but you could substitute “soul, spirit, consciousness” as a synonym.)

That above sample of XYZ’s are all simply experiences that someone may have. And experiences are fleeting — they come and go. So, “hitching your wagon” to fleeting experiences means by definition that your experience of happiness and peace will itself always be elusive — and fleeting.

And this leads to suffering. That’s what unfulfilled desires are — unhappiness. Lack of peace.

Oneness or “One-mess”?

So, back to the idea of “connecting with all of humankind” as a means to happiness and world peace.

People think they are doing something wrong when they don’t “feel connected” to all humankind. So they jump to the incorrect conclusion that the solution is to “experience that we are all one.”

First, let’s understand that there is absolutely nothing wrong with seeking connection with others — as long as we first “turn within” to connect with ourselves before we seek happiness and peace outside. In fact, I think “connection” with others can be a source of great happiness in life.

However, “connection” is not the same thing as “oneness with all other beings.” Connection does not mean “sameness.” It does not mean “we merge” with all other beings.

This is a common misstatement in today’s “pop spiritual culture.”

So we can travel as smoothly as possible along our respective paths to happiness, we need to be cognizant of the misplaced application of mathematical probability theories — like Quantum Mechanics — that have been contorted into allegedly “proving” this “oneness” theory.

Just because someone with a science background and an MD or PhD says it is so, does not make it accurate. Ask an actual expert in Quantum Mechanics if it is an accurate application of their theory. Ask if the theory was meant to explain physical reality. (Hint: it was not.)

Religious apologists abound on 🌎 Earth — and on the Other Side. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a religious apologist, but they should be honest and state that they are, that they — like religious preachers — have a belief that they are trying to persuade others to follow. Simply pointing to one’s doctorate status and calling oneself a scientist while ignoring the consistent use of rational, logical thinking does not make the analysis “scientific.”

The theory of oneness is a religious belief. Not a scientific fact. 

Here’s where it comes from. 

Many thousands of years ago, a relatively small group of, what we today would call, “spiritual leaders” each started having profound experiences of “connection” within themselves and extending outward feeling as if connected to all living and non-living things. This genuine experience was discussed over many lifetimes by these spiritual adepts and they quickly became a “self-referential” group, one where they started telling each other interpretations of that experience and then started postulating about what that experience meant in the larger scheme of things — in particular, human development. Thus was born the theory of “enlightenment” — the idea that one might eventually develop to a point where one would “merge” with something they called “the Absolute” or “oneness,” a concept where the individual would lose his or her individuality. 

The problem is that after 10,000 years of believing in this theory, not one of those spiritual leaders ever experienced the “merging” they had theorized about. So, they started rethinking the theory.

And now, they have relinquished that theory, and are convinced that the new theory of “life as a continual journey of making choices” makes more sense. Further, the making of choices (Free Will), they are pointing out, is something we each have control over. And they are encouraging us to make more consistent choices that align with bringing each of us more happiness.

So, even that early group of spiritual leaders has decided to jettison the concept of “oneness.”

Jesus Reminds Us

What did Jesus mean when he said, “Seek the Kingdom of Heaven Within”?

He was reminding us to “turn within” — that is my 21st century translation of what I remember him saying. To him “prayer” was not asking for things. It was a simple yet profound means of “turning within” and connecting with oneself — that “Kingdom” of peace within each of us. Many of you do this daily — as you meditate with yourself, allowing your mind to experience itself, its essential nature within.

That is what he taught. He espoused “knowing oneself” in that internal way as a means to “bringing Heaven on Earth” — translation, to uncover and draw out from inside us that profound inner peace so that we can enjoy our lives here on Earth as much as we each can.

He was not saying to “deny” the external world. He was saying to enjoy it. To enjoy it with others. And to enjoy it maximally by turning within first. 

Buddha Reminds Us

This is what Buddha meant when he said the world 🌎 is an illusion. 

He was advising us to “turn within” first. Not to be seduced by the wonder and beauty of the external world at the expense of one’s inner journey. One’s self-knowing. 

But he was not saying to divorce oneself from the world. Just to go inside first. Connect with oneself — the true seat of happiness within. Not to merely get caught up in the external world. 

That would be the path of illusion, according to him.

Not New

So, these are not new ideas. They are ancient.

But I think it bears reminding from time to time through the millennia. Because for various reasons — primarily fear and desperation — I have seen us as a species get caught up and seduced sometimes by the purveyors of the “quick fix” who promise us salvation and “world peace” without each of us having to do anything on the inside.

Merely by following a belief system — whether it makes logical sense or not — an implicit or explicit promise is made to us that never materializes.

My suggestion is instead to follow your own path. Do what makes sense to you. And connect with your own inner strength within. 

Then you will bring a stronger sense of self — a more self-actualized, nuanced and powerful sense of your being — when and if you choose to connect with others and help bring greater harmony to the world we live in.

You are your best — and ultimately — only teacher.
Take yourself to class inside daily.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Angels & Fear”

“Angels & Fear”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

There seems to be increased activity among some angels on the “Other Side” whenever a perceived crisis happens on planet Earth. Whether that be a World War, the end of a millennium or even the end of a century — 1699, 1799, 1899, 1999.

Now, it seems to be COVID-19, which should not be a surprise. After all, it is a global pandemic affecting all humans on planet Earth.

For those who pay attention to such things historically, they tend to be “ripe” for concocting messages around those events which supposedly predict the “end of life on planet Earth” (the same thing happened when AIDS was first identified in the 1980’s).

Impending apocalypses are routinely aimed at provoking fear among those humans prone to being fearful — which unfortunately is most of us! 

Now, 7.6 billion people.

And my observation is that many tend to use that hotbed of fear to promote ideas that are often self-serving. That includes minds on this side AND minds on the Other Side — yes, including some angels.

By the way, do not assume any being on the Other Side knows more than you do. Not necessarily so. Some may. But the fact they are a “light being” is meaningless when assessing that mind’s wisdom — after all when we die, it becomes clear we ALL are light beings. Think about that.

As many of you know, my work over the millennia and now again this lifetime is to reduce fear in the world, especially but not limited to the fear of death. That said, my goal is always to help people live their lives more fully in the present, regardless of their beliefs about death or dying — cultural or religious — and whether they believe in an “afterlife” (the Other Side), or not.

In addition, I take a rational approach toward looking at life. And that includes a rational, logical approach towards interpreting any experience we may have. That rational way of analyzing life has served me well in developing understandings that are cognitively consistent, not cognitively dissonant. And that has been the foundation of my happiness over the millennia.

So, I have a few thoughts about the current messages that seem to be floating about the social media airwaves on 2020 planet Earth.

Messages in Dreams or Other Visions

There seems to be an uptick in messages purportedly from the Other Side that portend a dire, almost cataclysmic future in the coming months and years. Keep in mind — these messages ALWAYS seems to happen when there are crises on Earth.

Such messages may come in the form of lucid dreams, visions or messages through psychics or other mediums. They can be visual, audio, telepathic or in some other form of communication, e.g., symbology, etc.

As I mentioned, I had messages from the Other Side come to me in 1986 about how quickly humankind needed to move more positively, otherwise…. For some reason, an inherent threat always seems to be included in that sort of fear message. 

And of course, the messages always have enough “general truth” in them to be considered accurate in hindsight, even if their overall specific message ends up being false (“mass chaos with foreign armies in the streets,” etc.).

Sources of the Messages

These messages from the Other Side can come from various sources. 

All of these sources are technically “light beings” because everyone and everything is made of light — in fact, that is true whether we are talking about on this side OR the Other Side. Sometimes we may perceive it in this way. Other times we may not. However, fundamentally, we are all “light beings.”

I think confusion often arises when someone experiences a communication from the Other Side, and forgets that fact.

Sometimes they are from dead relatives or loved ones, and they usually tell us so — and most importantly, we recognize their personalities so we have some external evidence of who they say they are even though they may appear to us as a “light being” — perhaps even in a bodily form we may recognize or simply an orb of light, etc.

Other times they may come from “light beings” we don’t personally recognize. This is when people typically jump to conclusions.

The most common interpretation of these “light being” experiences is almost always filtered through that person’s religious or cultural beliefs. So if someone is a believer in God, they typically interpret that “being” as “God.” That is the most common default. 

Sometimes they may instead call the “light being” a spiritual being they worship or respect — Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, or Archangel Michael, or perhaps some other entity they are familiar with.

And finally, if that person has already had some Other Side communications with a dead loved one or friend whose personality they recognize from “this side” prior to their physical biological death, then they may know that the “light being” is most likely that old friend.

You get the idea.

The person filters it through their own mind and bases it on their past experience having known the person, or if not, then on their belief system.

So, what’s my point?

When you hear a psychic or preacher say the message they are telling you is from “God,” “an archangel,” or whomever, don’t blindly believe them. Even if they ardently believe it themselves. 

Belief does not mean truth.

Content of the Messages — Predictions?

Whenever you hear someone say they are “prophesying” something, or that they can foretell the future, BE SUSPECT of everything they are saying.

Why?

Because anything that smells of “predicting the future” violates the fundamental universal principle of Free Will. 

Free Will means we have personal choices we each can make. And because of the 7.6 billion human minds on Earth (and that’s not counting all the dogs, cats, horses, etc. who also influence our choices), no “future” can be predicted with certainty. 

If anyone claims to predict the future with certainty, you know they either 1) don’t know what they are talking about, or 2) have a hidden agenda and are trying to fool you into following them. Either way flags someone not to be trusted.

The future is based on the continual present. And our present is obviously based on many choices that not only each of us is making, but also all of the other free-will thinking minds on Earth.

We each INFLUENCE each other. We do NOT control each other. But we do affect each other’s choices. Therefore, nothing can be predicted with certainty.

Yes, we can predict with some level of “probability” — the likelihood that something will happen. But never with certainty.

So, can someone get a message from this side or the Other Side saying that things on Earth may get messy in the coming months. Sure! But it would not take a rocket scientist — never mind a psychic or someone on the Other Side — to tell us that. The probabilities of it getting messy are obvious.

Do not buy into the fear inherent in that message.

That is what they WANT you to do.

Why, you may ask?

Angels’ Agenda

First, for those of you who don’t know, I started having communications with the Other Side in 1986 — it happened spontaneously when I was meditating, which is why I am a strong proponent of meditating if you want to open up to your own mind’s vastness as well as the vastness of the rest of the universe. 

The initial communications were with angels and archangels. I long ago in the late 1980’s found that they were more interested in my promoting their angelic beliefs on Earth than helping me with my own personal self-realization, so we each moved on. But I learned a lot from those two years communicating with them.

Why would angels want to convince humans that the Earth is in danger?

My experience is they have minds just like we all do. And as such, they have desires and emotions — hopes, dreams and expectations. Sometimes that comes with an agenda. Maybe even a hidden agenda.

First of all, understand that the angelic realm is not monolithic. That means they — like us — do not all believe the same thing. For example, the cadré of angels who hang out with me now are more “independent thinkers” — they tend to have their own ideas and beliefs about things, and are not followers of the masses of angels. 

Did I say “masses” of angels? Yes.

Just like on Earth, there are “the masses.” What does that term mean?

Well, think about it. It’s no different than here where you and I live — on Earth. There is the way most of the human population live and think, and we call that “the masses.” On the Other Side where angels live, there are also the masses, where most of them think and believe more or less similarly.

I would say most of the angels are there to help humans move forward in a more positive direction. However, might there be other angels who have less altruistic intentions?

Sure. Like I said, they are minds just like we are.

Why Would an Angel Promote Fear?

Let’s say an angel was promoting a fearful message of “the future” through a preacher or psychic. What would be the self-interest for an angel to do that?

Followers. 

Followers to add to their flock on the Other Side. If you have that as your goal, why not start recruiting those potential followers while they are still on Earth? And while you are at it, why not create dependence on those angels as the “spiritual leaders” who can guide you away from the fearful situation they are predicting.

That is the hallmark of any religious cult — develop dependency among the followers on the leader or leadership. Suppress independent thinking. But make it all about “helping” the followers move along their spiritual path.

Understand that historically, this is exactly what Paul, also known as “Saul of Tarsus,” did 2,000 years ago after Jesus was murdered. 

Religious historians who have read Paul’s original letters in Greek all agree that Paul was a promoter of the apocalypse — he was preaching that the “end of the world” was going to happen “within 6 weeks.” He openly discouraged people from buying property or marrying, and instead told them they should be blindly following him and the belief he created, so they would be rewarded by skipping to the front of the line to get into heaven.

Lots of people signed up. Many still are.

My suggestion: don’t be fooled by that well-worn, commonly-used spiritual recruitment song:

“Be afraid, be afraid.
Follow me, follow me.
I will save you, I will save you.”

What song is that? I don’t know. I just made it up. But you get the idea.

You have seen it sung before over the millennia, I am sure.

Alternative Choice

Instead, how about choosing to “follow yourself”?

Why not trust yourself — do what you can to strengthen yourself by “turning within.” The “inside out” approach.

Don’t always look to others and blindly do whatever they say — do what makes sense to you.

And if you do choose to listen to a psychic or preacher, I suggest that you still ask yourself whether what they say makes sense. Does it pass the “common sense” test?

Moreover, even if you do believe their predictions about dire things happening in your near future, why follow their advice to hoard food and buy guns? Doesn’t that sound like a fear-based approach to life?

“Build a fort. And defend it.” Really?

How about instead inspiring others to find solutions to problems that have existed for hundreds of thousands of years among human beings?

Are you helping solve the problems? Or are you simply adding fuel to the fire of fear?

Judge Their Behavior

My advice is to always judge others by their behavior. Not by what they say they are going to do. But what they actually do.

Ask yourself — is the psychic, spiritual leader or angel who says they are “not promoting fear but are here to help humankind on Earth” walking their talk? Do their words match their actions?

If you find they do not, then find a different source of advice.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Destiny & Losing A Child”

“Destiny & Losing A Child”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

First, it is hard if not impossible to make sense out of losing a child to physical death before we, as their parents, die.

Period. That is a given.

However, many parents who lose a child often ask me about “destiny” and whether they each had a role in crafting some sort of plan before birth that may have included the premature death of the child.

Destiny

As for this idea of “destiny,” you will see if you take my Afterlife & Reincarnation Experiences series, that I am a strong proponent of rational, demystified thinking. That yes, in my experience, the universe acts in a logical, understandable way. And that there are some basic fundamental principles that are consistent in our universe — on both this side and the other side.

Free Will

“Free Will” does exist for ALL minds. Without exception.

(NOTE: in my vocabulary, the term “mind” is synonymous with consciousness, soul, spirit, etc.)

So, that means everything is subject to change all the time, given the potential influence of trillions of minds on each of us at any given moment. Yes, some of those minds have a more direct, and others a more indirect influence on each of us, but ALL are influencing us all the time.

And, yes, along with the above principle, before we incarnate, we can have meetings with friends and others on the other side and “make plans” — or what some people call, “soul contracts.” In other words, we can choose to think and plan strategically before we come back in a new life in a new biological body.

That said, not just our own changing of our minds, but more importantly, the Free Will decisions by those trillions of other minds will affect our plans, especially as it/the plan unfolds.

So, yes, constant adjustment can be made, but we NEVER have full control over everything. No one does.

And I would argue no mind does…whether human, animal, angelic, god-like, or whatever other entity you want to label who has a “mind.” Otherwise, you will have created an exception to Free Will, which I think does not exist.

So, if one wants to “label” that pre-birth plan as a sort of “destiny,” fine. I’m ok with that as a loose metaphorical expression or term of art. But not literal. Not literally destiny, in the way most people think of destiny.

Because it is NEVER an absolute “pre-determined” plan or destiny with a guaranteed outcome (that is the way most people define  “destiny”). That would contravene the idea of Free Will completely. You simply cannot have both at the same time (Free Will and Determinism are oil and water). 

Period. 

It is blatantly illogical — if you hear some so-called “spiritual experts” making such statements, it is a red flag. Cognitively dissonant. An attempt at putting a round peg in a square hole. Question it.

I am here to reduce fear in the world.

To do that, sometimes requires undoing a lot of myths and illogical, cognitively dissonant thinking that, in my opinion, in the end can cause increased suffering in the world.

A Construction example

Using a construction project as an example might help illustrate this idea of destiny and Free Will.

Of course, the architect of the building is a key player in the project. You would be the architect of your “life plan.” And the building project plans would be analogous to your choosing to plan your life with others — before any of you incarnated into your physical biological body.

However, so that the analogy more accurately mirrors real life, we need to also inject all the contractors, subcontractors, lawyers, accountants and investors/bankers into the equation (and many more — e.g., their respective wives, husbands, children, aunts and uncles of all of those people, etc.— you get the picture!!). They also ALL have influence on the outcome of the construction project (post-birth).

So, to be thorough and realistic in our thinking and analysis, we also need to consider ALL the Free Will choices and decisions made by each of those many minds and the ripple effect — both direct and indirect — of those probably millions of choices on your original “pre-birth” plan that you, perhaps, may have had with your child who tragically died prematurely,

And so, at the end of the day, with such a complex interconnection and interaction with so many minds’ choices, we might just as well end up having to say that your child’s death is not able to be “figured out” — the unanswerable “Why did it happen?” That there may be no “reason” for it. Maybe you and s/he had a pre-birth agreement, but even if you did, with all the Free Will minds involved (NOT just yours and his/hers), the bottom line is that neither of you ever had full control over the outcome. Life is all about probabilities, not guarantees.

All we can do is act with what we know at the moment. Control and influence what we can. But we cannot foresee and take into account — much less “control” — every possible choice that every possible mind in the universe will make. Otherwise they don’t have Free Will. And they all do.
We all do.

As painful as it is to lose a child, I hope that perspective helps.




Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Karma Unbundled” 

“Karma Unbundled” 

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert & Meditation Teacher

I will cut to the chase.

The whole notion of “karma” was a made-up theory by a group of Vedic spiritual leaders about 10,000 years ago. (See 30thNovember.com for details of the group). And “dharma” too. I discuss this in greater detail in my Afterlife & Reincarnation Experiences session on “Punishment and Rewards, Hell, Karma, Dharma and Sin...” (See a description of the Series here.)

What was their intent in creating these theories?

Essentially to help move humankind forward by prodding us to act more kindly, with fewer human sacrifices (ideally, none), and to be less lazy in our behavior and actions. That’s the reason in a nutshell. Again, see the above-mentioned 30thNovember talk if you are curious for more in-depth historical details.

But, back to the theory itself…

So, are there consequences to our actions? Is there karma in that sense? Absolutely yes. Everything we do has consequences. 

But there’s no cosmic “accounting system” of “rewards and punishment” given out by some tribunal of godlike judges or by some innate omnipresent energy force (sometimes people will call it “the Universe” or “Mother Nature”).

In other words, karma is not structural. It’s not some independent eternal universal concept — it was a theory made up by a small group of well-meaning spiritual leaders about 10,000 years ago to curb human sacrifices and other extremely hurtful behavior. And then over the millennia, the theory got further conflated and added to by other religious and spiritual leaders who sometimes had less altruistic intent — for more power over others, or to control the behavior of others.

To the point now where billions of people believe they amass “mountains of karma” that may take them millions of lifetimes to get rid of...and that’s only assuming they don’t accumulate any more “bad karma” on a daily basis (which of course they think they are doing)! So they are left bereft, distraught, defeated and depressed. Constantly living in fear and unhappiness. Afraid to live life for fear of making the “millions of lifetimes” become “billions of lifetimes”...

All the while not realizing it was just a theory to start with. Not a pronouncement of some supposed structural universal principle in the universe. 

The Perceived Need For Certainty 

Why has this “blind” belief in the idea of karma, which has risen to an almost religiously-fevered pitch, become so popular? 

Because people want certainty. And they want certainty because their level of inner security demands it. Because we are essentially disconnected within ourselves and therefore insecure, lacking in inner strength. 

So we grasp at anything — yes, even a theory like karma — a theory that if we examine it more closely is fear-inflating, and so it really is not in our best interest. But it seems to give us certainty. It gives us a rule to follow — “Don’t do bad stuff or you will get punished with bad karma. Do good stuff and you will get rewarded by chipping away at your pile of bad karma with your good karma.”

And following that rule is seemingly easier than figuring out within ourselves what makes us happy and basing our choices on that. Because that involves “turning within” and each of us looking at our individual desires and emotional patterns — oooooh, way too much work! So, instead we blindly follow some rule.

And the rule — which started out 10,000 years ago as a theory — is perpetuated.

Free Will

But looking at this old theory about karma more dispassionately, it also contradicts Free Will. 

Free Will means freedom of choice to make any decision one wishes. That means hurtful or helpful decisions. And, hurtful or helpful to oneself...or to others. 

And if that’s the case, it means without restriction. That’s what Free Will means. Otherwise it’s not “free” will. 

Again, I’m talking about this from a spiritual standpoint. Not social. Socially, we may decide to have laws or codes of conduct that forbid certain unacceptable, hurtful behavior. I leave that to the social scientists to decide what and how is best to manage our social behavioral issues. So I am not suggesting we should have no prisons for bad actors in our society, nor am I debating whether that is the best means for curbing their bad social behavior.

Instead, I am talking about this spiritually. And the social issue of having societal laws to follow is not the same as an eternal individual soul “amassing mountains of good or bad karma.”

And looking around for even a split second, we can all see examples of the existence of our Free Will. Our ability to make personal choices — even to disagree when told to do something and to make the opposite choice.

Has anyone ever observed the behavior of a 2-year-old child?

So since Free Will clearly exists, and since it does not fit along with the (now) old theory of karma, even from that standpoint — logically — karma must be the incorrect of the two ideas.

Randomness of Life 

Life is much more random than most of us realize, or would like to admit.

Yes, we do make our own individual choices. And yes, we should make those decisions in as informed a way as possible, and try to take control of our lives as much as we can. Of course that is true.

However, we must also be equally aware of this unmistakeable fact in life: everything is not within our control. Nor is it even possible that everything would be able to be within our control.

Why?

Because many other minds are always involved, known and unknown, in our lives. Directly and indirectly. Seen and unseen. And their Free Will is always operating — their inherent right to have varying desires and their innate ability to act on those desires. In that sense, there’s an inherent randomness to our lives caused in large part by the constant and ever-changing effects of the Free Will of those many minds.

That is just a fact.

And moreover, would we want it any other way? I don’t think so. Wouldn’t we each rather have our individual Free Will to make our own choices in life? Absolutely yes. I think we would all agree to that.

Well, then that comes with consequences. And the randomness in life, i.e., the lack of full control of everything that happens in our lives is part of that consequence.

No Rewards & No Punishments 

No one is rewarded structurally — maybe psychologically, individually and internally — yes, sometimes — but not externally by “the Universe.” And no one is structurally, externally punished by the universe. Said another way: there is no structural place or system of punishment that exists in the system of the universe. It only exists in the minds of some people who choose to believe in that. But that is belief-based. Not based in the structure of reality. 

Yes, no exceptions. Not even a universal structural punishment for Hitler, Stalin, Idi Amin, Genghis Khan. They’re only held accountable by themselves and that’s only if they choose to be. That’s what I mean by internally, individually and psychologically. It’s between Genghis Khan and Genghis Khan to figure out his stuff, if he wants to. No external structure is making him be accountable. Yes. Did he piss off women he raped. Absolutely. Are there consequences from those actions? Absolutely. But it’s his choice to work out those relationships in subsequent lifetimes or not. And it’s also those women’s choices to do so with him or within themselves — or not. All have their individual Free Will operating. Always.

(For what would drive such a personality to acknowledge his accountability, see my essay on Transcending Cruelty below.)

Final Thoughts 

As we have said, there is no karmic “external accounting system” at play. 

After the initial theory of karma was conjured up about 10,000 years ago, that idea was then added to — and conflated further by others — in the subsequent thousands of years.

I hope that helps free you up to enjoy life now with less fear. Discernment and awareness of the consequences of one’s actions is always good — yes — but now we should do the discernment with much less fear. That is the current goal of those who originally created the theory 10,000 years ago.

Similarly, it also the goal of those of us who have been asked by the creators of the theory to let others know that their original intent was a good one, albeit flawed, and thus is now being abandoned. Instead, it is now being replaced in favor of Free Will, the idea that life is an eternal democracy, and that we can transcend cruelty.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Ego”

“Ego”

by Kelvin Chin
Meditation Teacher

(Note: I am not discussing “ego” in psychological terms here.
I am looking at it through the spiritual filter.)



is ego bad?

What about this idea in some spiritual circles that “ego is bad”? Limiting. A negative part of, or description of us.

I strongly disagree.

redefinition

Ego, for me, means individuality. It is therefore neutral. Neither good nor bad. It is just a descriptive term.

How we express that individuality is up to each of us.

I think we tend to insert a negative, limiting connotation to “ego” when we sometimes — within ourselves — feel limited and helpless. We have all been there.

But our individuality is who we are. We are each unique, vibrant, sentient beings.

Individuals.

And there is a profound beauty in that reality. Accepting that is true “self-love.” Not accepting that is self-loathing.

We often hear people use the term “unconditional love.” As I have spoken about on other occasions, that is a redundant term. Love means “accepting the other for who they are, not who we wish they would be.”

So, loving ourselves already means accepting who we are without conditions.

And we each are individuals. With uniquely operating minds (souls, spirits, consciousnesses, all synonymous) and we need to accept and embrace that fact if we are truly “walking our talk” about love and self-love.

Otherwise we are just talking and wasting our breath. Preaching but not acting. Spiritually fraudulent.

the shift

So what is the missing link? How do we make the shift to more fully accepting our individuality — our “ego” sense of self?

First step, make the recognition that we just discussed.

Next step, turning within.

By regularly practicing a technique of effortlessly “turning within,” we automatically begin to nurture and strengthen the connection with ourselves, deep within. And by releasing our physical- emotional stresses and expanding our conscious capacity for mental-psychic experience, we can begin to directly experience the profundity and vastness of who we truly are as human beings. We begin to break the self-imposed limitations. We no longer feel helpless. We feel confident, secure.

We can then experience the sublime power and expansive connectedness we each have within ourselves and can begin to express that outwardly to the world 🌎 around us — our friends, loved ones, acquaintances and yes, strangers.

But this recognition and acceptance of our individuality — and thus ego — as a starting point, is key. Only from that initial understanding can we blossom and grow in our own self-love before we can share that with others — in our families, our work, our lives.

Negating our ego, our individuality, is a non-starter. Why start by shackling, by limiting ourselves?

Of course I understand it is usually neither conscious nor intentional. Understandably, it often comes from a place of vulnerability and helplessness.

But it can be turned around and our individuality made to be a source of strength by “turning within” and experiencing the greatness that lies within us — that is an integral part of “who we are” as individual beings, as beings of light who are temporarily in the bodies of human beings.

From that place of inner power, self-confidence and self-knowing, we can truly begin to experience what life as an individual living on Earth 🌍 can be.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Attachment & Illusion”

“Attachment & Illusion”

by Kelvin Chin
Meditation Teacher 


NON-ATTACHMENT

Where does the notion of “non-attachment” come from?

It stems from the Vedic idea that we are not our thoughts and emotions. Those are our “experiences.” Instead, the teaching point the Vedic teachers were trying to get across was that we are the “experiencer.” Not the experiences. And that I think was their essential point. And I agree with that distinction.

A point of identification I would also call it. That we should not identify our thoughts and actions with “who we are.”

We are the experiencer. Not the experiences.

Make sense?

ILLUSION

Where does the notion of “illusion” come from in spirituality?

It stems from the Buddhist concept (Buddhism is an offshoot of the more ancient Vedic tradition) that the material world we see around us is also not “who we are” in our essence. So it is a similar concept to the previous one about “non-attachment.”

So while I agree with those in principle, I caution us in following those ideas “in practice.”

What do I mean by that?

What I mean is that the principles themselves as a description and suggestion of how we should view our waking state world are accurate and can be helpful, I think.

But I do not think they were meant to be used as a description of a technique or practice of how to change our mindset, our perspectives, or conscious awareness about the material and non-material worlds, or the relationship between the experiencer and his/her experiences.

THE MISTAKE

It is, in essence, a misapplication of the following principle: “The description of where you want to go is not identical to the description of how to get there.”

That, I think, is the most common mistake that has been made in spirituality for millennia:

A description of the goal has been taken to be the means for the path to get there

As I said above, the Vedic idea about non-attachment, and the Buddhist idea about illusion are both accurate descriptions of reality, that the material world is not all that exists. And that we should not get attached to our thoughts, desires and emotions since they are not who we are — we are our own unique individual minds which are experiencing those experiences.

However, how those ideas are put into a self-development practice is where the “rubber meets the road.” Because that inner practice determines all-important outcomes and effects in our daily lives.

Understanding that our mind is distinct from — and not the same as — our thoughts and emotions is an important knowledge point.

That said, using the notion of “non-attachment” as a meditation technique, where one tries to remain “unattached” from one’s thoughts and emotions is an unnecessary and ill-advised jump that often has unintended negative consequences. In my meditation teaching, I would describe that as a forcing of the mind to which the mind resists and then contracts from. This is the exact opposite of what a meditation technique is meant to promote.

Similarly, seeing the material world as “illusion” and using that as an inner mental practice can lead to a dislike — even a contempt and divorcing of oneself from the world 🌎 Long-term practice of such techniques can also lead to halting speech, indicating a lack of full integration of thought and emotion into the speech pattern and behavior.

Why does this happen?

Separation and control. By continually manipulating or forcing the mind into that state, a sort of “split” can occur.

Consistent practice leads to greater separation — separation of mind, body and spirit. Again, the exact opposite intent of meditation techniques.

A REDEFINITION

Instead, an effortless technique of allowing the mind to experience itself in a natural uncontrolled, non-manipulative way nurtures a growing state of connection within oneself. Integration. Coordination and balance among mind, body and spirit.

The goal or objective of any meditation technique should be the same. Allowing the mind to experience itself in this different way, different from applying the same rules that we apply in waking state, and instead applying “meditation rules” in meditation, that lead us to “allowing our mind to experience itself.” 

That’s it. Nothing more complicated than that. But the rubber meets the road in how you get there. The practice itself.

So in the end, technique is everything. But once the pathway is established, and very familiar, even the technique will eventually drop away.

Those meditation teachers who understand and apply these basic principles are the ones who understand more fully how differently the mind operates in meditation than in any other state. Those are the teachers who can help you accelerate your self-knowing, your unique personal growth.

Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Scary Dreams”

“Scary Dreams”

by Kelvin Chin
Meditation Teacher

Scary dreams can happen anytime of course — before or after we learn to meditate. They’re not uncommon and happen when we’re releasing old fears.

There are basically two kinds of dreams — fantasy dreams and creative type dreams. Fantasy dreams can sometimes be fun and other times be scary. Creative dreams are the kind that we can get insights from.

“Turning Within” Meditation can facilitate both types of dreaming. Why? Because this meditation is waking the mind up to more of its creative potential, and at the same time is releasing old stress and balancing the system.

Plus, meditating in the morning right after waking up can also be helpful in spontaneously getting rid of the “cobwebs” sometimes left over from the scary dreams.

Whatever is causing the release, we don’t know, but the meditation is definitely not causing the scary dreams — the stress that you have stored up for probably years (and you are unaware of), is what’s causing the scary dreams. Whether the meditation — or a combination of the meditation and your sleeping — is causing the release, we will never know for sure, but the releasing is what’s good and important.

But regardless of what is causing the release, it’s not uncommon to notice strong, powerful, and sometimes scary dreams. And the intensity of the emotional experience is always connected to the intensity of the stress that has been sitting around in the nervous system. So the more intense it is, the “better a sign” that you have released something very powerful that’s been eating up a lot of energy — psychically, emotionally, or physically — that you were likely not even aware of.

We live in a world from a healthcare standpoint, as you probably know, which does not understand these things very well at all. We tend to live in a culture — and the healthcare world is part of that culture — where we think everything should be fine and smooth and we incorrectly think that is when we are “healthy,” i.e., not symptomatic. (“Give me a pill, and make my problems/symptoms disappear!”) But the symptoms are just a sign of what is underneath, sometimes of tensions and imbalances lying deeply underneath the surface. Those are what are causing our problems and need to be released/balanced.

Also...

We in the process often forget how many decades we’ve been building up junk in our system and while it won’t take decades to get rid of that junk, the rebalancing process will undoubtedly have some ups and downs and not be a completely placid/even/flat situation. It’s weird because we completely accept that we all sometimes have terrible times in our lives (and then when we get past them we often forget that we went through the terrible times). However, when it comes to our mental/emotional/physical health, and when we’re getting healthier, we somehow think (unrealistically) that we should be able to have no ups and downs...

The good news is that this simple meditation technique is accelerating the healing process exponentially because you are not only getting rid of old baggage, but also you are taking on less new junk.

The other thing that I tell people in my meditation classes is that our nervous system is also getting “used to” the balancing and releasing of old junk in the sense that our body does not know yet (especially if you just started recently), that you are going to be doing it every single day twice a day. So the body jumps at the opportunity to try to get rid of as much baggage 🧳 as possible as quickly as possible — which underscores the importance of the consistency and regularity of doing it twice a day in order to train the mind-body system that it can release stuff gradually ...and does not have to try to release it all at once. 
😉

The body seeks balance, i.e., homeostasis.

The “Turning Within” Meditation technique allows the body and mind to naturally get what it has been seeking. In as easy and comfortable a way as possible.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Love & Self-Interest”

“Love & Self-Interest”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Where does the notion that we “should not be self-interested” come from?

I think one source is the angelic religion. Some people who have had NDEs and some psychics have had communications from light beings who appear to be angels.

Like many of us, some of these beings can become enthusiastic promoting their religious beliefs — which occasionally can even include worshipping them. In those cases, what better message to send to the humans than “you are not worthy,” and “to be worthy, you need to not be selfish and loving yourself is being selfish.”

Now, is this agenda true for all angels? No. Not all of them with whom I’ve communicated are out promoting their religious beliefs. And keep in mind, even those who are proselytizing — going “door-to-door” or in this case “mind-to-mind” — may genuinely think it’s in your best interest for them to guide you in that direction.

They may sincerely believe they know better than you how to live your life.

But for those angels who do that, that is often the first step to convince humans not to self-love, that self-love is selfish. And instead, to convince humans that to love is to “first love others.” Not yourself.

What does that message do? It creates insecurity. It undermines self-confidence. It ultimately creates dependence on others for one’s happiness.

And typically, when a light being talks to humans, those humans listen. Because they often incorrectly assume the light being is all-knowing. And, after all, you may say for example after an NDE, “But they showed me my ‘life review’! It was amazing!”

Yes. But we should not confuse power with wisdom.

And no one can look out for our self-interest as effectively as we each can.

My teaching is that self-interest is neutral. Neither positive nor negative. It just is. It is a universal reality.

So light beings are also naturally self-interested. They will tell you what makes them happy. Which might be following them. Worshipping them. Without any bad intention. As we said, they may actually think it is best for you.

But do you? Always ask yourself that. That’s your self-interest talking. That’s you looking out for yourself.

That’s true self-love.

Don’t allow anyone — whether they are a light being or a human — take away your independent ability to love yourself.

Actually you always have that ability. No one can ever “take it away.” But you can sort of “give it away” by not exercising it.

Love ❤️ is a powerful force in the universe. Exercise it.

And first and foremost, exercise it for yourself. 



Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Self-Interested versus Self-Centered”

“Self-Interested versus Self-Centered”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Could therein be both the cause and solution to the world’s problems on this planet? 

In fact, that may be where “the rubber meets the road” — the distinction between being self-interested and self-centered.

Let’s unbundle this — one of the most widespread human inner conflicts.


Self-Interested 

I think we are all self-interested. Meaning we look out for our own needs, our own interests. What matters to us. I think that’s not only normal and natural. But most importantly, it’s necessary. 

After all, if I didn’t get food and shelter for myself, who else would? On a basic survival level, I wouldn’t survive if I didn’t look out for myself. My needs.

And not just my basic physical needs for survival. I need to look out for and try to meet my mental and emotional needs as well. Because we are not merely physical beings. We are mental, emotional, and arguably, spiritual beings in physical bodies. 

So, someone needs to be the primary caretaker and gatherer of those needs. And that someone is each of us. For each of us. 

That makes logical sense. Right?

And in my opinion, this is important to recognize. Because if we recognize and accept that each of us is self-interested in this way that I’ve described — that it is a normal, natural tendency we all have — then we can be more conscious and intentional about looking out for the needs that others around us may have. Recognize their interests. And perhaps help them meet those needs and interests. 

By doing so, we would support that other person, and nurture and cultivate our relationship with them. By helping them be more happy. And “what goes around, comes around.” Right?

If they’re happier, we’re happier. It’s a win-win.


self-centered = “selfish”

However, if we are unable to be self-aware enough to see that potential asset — that potentially relationship-altering perspective — then our relationship will likely fall into disrepair. 

Because that lack of self-awareness will probably push our neutral self-interested state of mind over to being self-centered. When we become excessively self-interested, we become self-centered. And when that happens, we become selfish.

Isolated

Alone

We have moved off the neutral state of being self-interested to the negative, energy-draining state of being self-centered. We have become “selfish.”

Lonely

We lose our connection with others. Because we have lost our connection within ourselves.


“Turning Within”

By “turning within” and connecting within ourselves, we naturally “feed” ourselves from the inside out. It’s the basis for the process of self-awareness.

Then we can begin to develop a more complete perspective on our place in the world and how to nurture and develop our state of happiness in a way that does not harm others. Does not “take” from others. Does not drain others.

That honors our self-interested nature, and yet, does not cross the line to selfishness.

But it only can be a reality if we each first take care of ourselves from within. By releasing the frustration and anger that accumulates. So we don’t project it onto those around us. That is where self-interest crosses the line to selfishness. That’s when we begin to hurt ourselves and others.

And the development of a life as a self-aware being starts with recognition. So seeing that is a beginning step. Seeing that we sometimes cross that line is a critical first step. Then we can begin to do something about it. We can begin to change our behavior, catching ourselves more often when we see ourselves shifting to being selfish from our normal, innate state of self-interestedness.

But as I said, that cannot be done effectively by simply changing one’s thoughts about this. It has to come from deep within. From the inner fabric of who we are. By stimulating that part of us that can release us from the binding influence of past stresses in our lives, and expanding our conscious capacity for mental experience that truly broadens our perspective.

Then we will feel inwardly more balanced and more naturally find ourselves living life from the normal state of self-interest…with fewer wanderings into selfishness.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The Nuances of Forgiveness”

“The Nuances of Forgiveness”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

We’ve all heard of the concept of forgiveness.  Or maybe we ourselves have even uttered the words,

“I forgive you”

And many spiritual and religious circles encourage forgiving others often stating outright that it is the “holy” or “righteous” or “giving” or “loving” thing to do. It is often made into a somewhat simplistic, almost trite act that “all good people should do.”

They use the idea of forgiveness as if it implies, “I’m ok with the bad stuff you said or did. I’m not angry at you. And I don’t hold a grudge against you for it.”

And then, poof, everything is hunky-dory after that! Everything is fine.

I think it is more complicated and nuanced than that.

Forgiveness and Love


First, let’s define love. Because I think love plays an intimate role in thinking about forgiveness.

“Love” — in the way I remember Jesus defined and exemplified it in his daily life — is “accepting the other person for who they are, not who you wish they were.”

So let’s keep that definition of love, not the Hollywood romanticized definition of love (as some feeling of butterflies in your tummy...which always goes away eventually after the initial newness of the infatuation wears off), as we think about the idea of Forgiveness.

By using this definition of love as acceptance, we can move away from “judging” the other person internally — their motives, their state of mind, their degree of self-awareness, etc. All of which are impossible to accurately discern and determine.

And instead, we can focus on the other person’s external behavior. What they did or said. And how it affected us.

Forgiveness I’m defining as our decision to move on after accepting whatever that behavior by the other person was. We can either choose to move on with the other person or without them. But forgiving means we are moving on — mentally and emotionally — and yes, maybe physically.

Not forgetting what they said or did. Because no one ever forgets.

But moving forward. That is how I’m using the idea of forgiveness here.

Degrees of Forgiveness

Forgiveness as a simple acceptance of “I’m sorry”

Perhaps the simplest form of forgiveness is the one where the other person just slips up in a relatively minor way, maybe even unintentionally — what we used to call when I was a kid an “Oops” or a “boo-boo”...or maybe even a combination as in, “Oops, I made a boo-boo! Sorry about that!”

So then you say simply, “Yeah, no big deal. I forgive ya.” And you both quickly move on.

That’s the easy situation. The least intense. The almost non-thinking dispensing of forgiveness because whatever the other person perceived as “bad” behavior wasn’t even that bad in your mind or maybe was hardly even noticeable by you.

Love in the way we defined it is easy to implement. It’s easy to accept the other person and what they did because it hardly had an impact on us. The forgiveness is more of an acknowledgement of their saying “I’m sorry” than anything else. Our “judgment meter” was barely turned on. The misstep in their behavior was hardly a ripple in the vast goodness of the ocean of our existing relationship.

We forgave them and moved on.


Forgiveness as “I accept what you did as an expression of who you were at that moment, it was bad, and I’m ok with it”

A slightly more intense level of radar assessment on our part gets triggered here.

Whatever they did — maybe they got in our face and criticized us for something they already know we know we need to act on. It’s as if we go, “Ok, we’ve been down this road before, your behavior ticks me off, but I’ve chosen to live with it.”

Why? Because we’ve chosen to love the other person in that way we described (accepting them for who they are, not who we wish they were). And their “bad” behavior is relatively minor and acceptable, as far as our relationship is concerned.

It’s a bit more intense than the first situation because we are ill affected by the behavior and it does bother us, but again, it is more than a slight ripple, maybe like a wave but still relatively minor on the vast ocean of that relationship.


Forgiveness as “I accept what you did as an expression of who you were at that moment and I’m not ok with it”

In this situation, we need to assess both their behavior and how it affects us more deeply. First, as always, we are assessing the other person’s behavior as acceptable or not.

And where that line is varies from person to person. We are not a monolithic human race who all act and react the same to all situations. We are each unique.

Forgiveness is not a blind act. It may be in theory. But it never is in reality. 

And the last time I checked, we live in reality. Not in some world of theory.

So, when I forgive you for whatever you did that I assessed as bad (maybe hurtful, or inappropriate in some way), I have a choice. I can choose to stay in the relationship or not.

The reality I need to accept is that if I stay in the relationship, I am continuing to accept the potentiality of more of that same bad behavior. Because as the saying goes, “the leopard does not change his spots.”

In other words, people don’t change overnight. Behavior does not change overnight. It takes a long long time, many years, arguably many lifetimes to change deep-seated personality traits that are the source of our behavior, good and bad.

So by making the choice to stay in the relationship, we are choosing to accept the behavior. Make no mistake about it, we need to be clear in our own minds that we are in fact making that choice. By that very action. Even if we say, “I forgive you.”

Said another way, we should not delude ourselves into thinking that since we had a conversation with the other person about the bad behavior, and since we forgave them, that that mere conversation and dispensing of forgiveness will change their behavior. The change of their behavior has to come from within themselves, not from our persuading them to change. Nor by our forgiveness. Forgiveness frees us up — it does not necessarily change them.

And as we said, behavior takes many years to change. 


Forgiveness as “I accept what you did as an expression of who you were at that moment, I’m definitely not ok with it, and
see you later”

In this more intense situation, we have decided that enough is enough. And notwithstanding however many conversations we have had with the other person, we have decided that the level of their bad behavior is such that it is no longer mutually beneficial for us to stay together.

Nevertheless, we can still end the relationship with forgiveness in the way I have suggested here. By moving onward, and going our separate ways. And without anger — because we have accepted them for who they have been (we have not resisted that reality, otherwise that resistance to who they are would have caused us frustration and anger). 

So then, even in this most extreme intense situation, we can still move on with forgiveness and love for the other person. We can choose to do so because the relationship is no longer mutually beneficial. We are no longer being nurtured by the other person in our relationship. 

Moving on in this way would perhaps be a way to demonstrate not only our respect and love for ourselves — the ultimate in self-love — but also showing our maturity as a soul living with and relating with other souls in our many and varied relationships throughout our lives.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.